With all of the talk going on about presumptive nominee Mitt Romney's time at Bain Capital, John Sununu (former NH governor) makes great points about Obama.
RR
Monday, July 16, 2012
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Really Barry?
This man knows no bounds. We don't know who his friends were in college, we have not seen his grades, and he has the nerve to say you have to be an open book? We have to get this man out of office pronto.
RR
RR
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
We Can't Afford NOT to Repeal Obamacare
In his new blog post: Obamacare, the CBO, and the downward spiral of statist economics, Glenn Gogoleski makes a few points about Obamacare that we all should keep in mind:
•$1 trillion cost projection is an underestimate that includes only six rather than 10 years of subsidies; $2.4 trillion is a more accurate cost projection for the first decade.
•The Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act (CLASS)that was built into Obamacare will not generate the $70 billion expected. That idea was scrapped from the original plan. That means more than $70 billion of the supposed 10-year deficit reduction of $123 billion from the original cost estimate is already gone.
•Spending cuts to Medicare in Obamacare are not real and based upon a flawed premise that Medicare payments to doctors can fall below payments from Medicaid.
•Double-counting – a heavy reliance on cuts to the Medicare program to pay for the massive entitlement expansions in the legislation. But a large part of the Medicare cuts (and payroll tax increases) is also supposed to pay for future benefits out of the Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund. In other words, the savings from the cuts and taxes is spent twice—once on Obamacare’s entitlements and then again to fill a hole in the trust fund so that future Medicare claims can be met. The end result is not deficit reduction, as Obamacare’s apologists claim, but a massive increase in deficit spending over the long term.
•The CBO assumes that in 2019 only 19 million Americans will receive insurance through the health care exchanges, when in fact most workers will be better off foregoing employer health care coverage, taking cash instead of the benefits, and using Obamacare’s entitlement package for their health care.
•There’s the $300 billion in physician fees. The Administration scooped up every Medicare cut it could find to pay for Obamacare and then said it wanted to add new physician fee spending to the deficit without any offsets. But just because they tried to keep two sets of books doesn’t mean the deficit won’t go up. It will, as the combined effect of the “doc fix” and Obamacare is unquestionably an increase in the deficit. •Finally, there are the omitted costs. CBO admits that a lot of the costs for administering Obamacare aren’t counted in the original cost estimate. There’s at least $5 billion to $10 billion in Health and Human Services (HHS) spending, and another $5 billion to $10 billion for the IRS. Just this year, HHS asked for an additional $850 million to pay for setting up a federal backup exchange in 2013.
None of these costs are counted in the original cost estimate. As we await the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare, it is nice to be reminded of what we were told, compared to the truth which was concealed. RR
•$1 trillion cost projection is an underestimate that includes only six rather than 10 years of subsidies; $2.4 trillion is a more accurate cost projection for the first decade.
•The Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act (CLASS)that was built into Obamacare will not generate the $70 billion expected. That idea was scrapped from the original plan. That means more than $70 billion of the supposed 10-year deficit reduction of $123 billion from the original cost estimate is already gone.
•Spending cuts to Medicare in Obamacare are not real and based upon a flawed premise that Medicare payments to doctors can fall below payments from Medicaid.
•Double-counting – a heavy reliance on cuts to the Medicare program to pay for the massive entitlement expansions in the legislation. But a large part of the Medicare cuts (and payroll tax increases) is also supposed to pay for future benefits out of the Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund. In other words, the savings from the cuts and taxes is spent twice—once on Obamacare’s entitlements and then again to fill a hole in the trust fund so that future Medicare claims can be met. The end result is not deficit reduction, as Obamacare’s apologists claim, but a massive increase in deficit spending over the long term.
•The CBO assumes that in 2019 only 19 million Americans will receive insurance through the health care exchanges, when in fact most workers will be better off foregoing employer health care coverage, taking cash instead of the benefits, and using Obamacare’s entitlement package for their health care.
•There’s the $300 billion in physician fees. The Administration scooped up every Medicare cut it could find to pay for Obamacare and then said it wanted to add new physician fee spending to the deficit without any offsets. But just because they tried to keep two sets of books doesn’t mean the deficit won’t go up. It will, as the combined effect of the “doc fix” and Obamacare is unquestionably an increase in the deficit. •Finally, there are the omitted costs. CBO admits that a lot of the costs for administering Obamacare aren’t counted in the original cost estimate. There’s at least $5 billion to $10 billion in Health and Human Services (HHS) spending, and another $5 billion to $10 billion for the IRS. Just this year, HHS asked for an additional $850 million to pay for setting up a federal backup exchange in 2013.
None of these costs are counted in the original cost estimate. As we await the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare, it is nice to be reminded of what we were told, compared to the truth which was concealed. RR
Saturday, February 4, 2012
Unemployment Rate 8.3% for January
While this is great news that the unemployment rate has fallen to its lowest rate since February 2009, there is more to the numbers as Rick Santelli explains below.
RR
RR
Sunday, August 21, 2011
Robert Scott calls out Arne Duncan
Arne Duncan, the Secretary of the Department of Education, made a foolish statement this week when he said the following
Texas’s school system “has really struggle" and he went on to say “I feel very, very badly for the children there.”
Robert Scott calls out Arne Duncan (with good reason) | Opinion Blog | dallasnews.com
Texas’s school system “has really struggle" and he went on to say “I feel very, very badly for the children there.”
Robert Scott calls out Arne Duncan (with good reason) | Opinion Blog | dallasnews.com
Saturday, August 6, 2011
The Jobs President
From Investors Business Daily interview with Bernie Marcus co-founder of Home Depot:
I think he is absolutely right. We spent 1 trillion dollars on a stimulus that failed. This President has surrounded himself with people who know nothing about job creation.
The unemployment numbers out this week show a decrease in the rate to 9.1%, while adding only 117K jobs. Keep in mind that 200K jobs a month are needed to make any significant changes to the unemployment rate. The response from the White House "Things are going to get better," Obama said.
We shall see Mr. President, we shall see.
RR
IBD: If you could sit down with Obama and talk to him about job creation, what would you say?
Marcus: I'm not sure Obama would understand anything that I'd say, because he's never really worked a day outside the political or legal area.
I think he is absolutely right. We spent 1 trillion dollars on a stimulus that failed. This President has surrounded himself with people who know nothing about job creation.
The unemployment numbers out this week show a decrease in the rate to 9.1%, while adding only 117K jobs. Keep in mind that 200K jobs a month are needed to make any significant changes to the unemployment rate. The response from the White House "Things are going to get better," Obama said.
We shall see Mr. President, we shall see.
RR
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Earlier this week:
“I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 3rd if we haven’t resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it,” Mr. Obama said in an interview with CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley, according to excerpts released by CBS News.
Today we had the chief actuary of Social Security telling Kansas Republican Rep. Tim Huelskamp that the decision whether or not to withhold checks comes from the treasury.
RR
“I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 3rd if we haven’t resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it,” Mr. Obama said in an interview with CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley, according to excerpts released by CBS News.
Today we had the chief actuary of Social Security telling Kansas Republican Rep. Tim Huelskamp that the decision whether or not to withhold checks comes from the treasury.
RR
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)