Well this is what I know.
- Sen. Obama and most of the democrats called the Bush tax cuts, cuts for the rich. I find this to be humorous that now we are so worried about the middle class. Are these taxes just for the rich or are they for all Americans? If they are for all Americans, when will the democrats apologize for characterizing these tax cuts as just for the rich.
- All democrats listen very closely. You do not have a leg to stand on. You have been in power (Congress) since 2007 and have had a democratic President for almost 2 years. You could have passed new tax laws at any point during that time. You instead chose to focus on health care, cap and trade, don't ask don't tell, and other issues that you deemed more important. When democrats blame the lack of an extension on the tax cuts on Republicans it is a flat out lie. Either you are really bad with math (255-180) (58-40 +2 Independents who caucus with the Dems) Is enough to get any bill passed for example healthcare.
- I am all for lowering the deficit. That is why I have taken the position of letting all of the tax cuts expire. Dems are all about raising taxes and dems claim we need more revenue, let them all expire. Let's see what happens. Will this really help close the gap? or will dems find something else to spend this new found revenue on?
RR
Monday, November 29, 2010
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Monday, October 25, 2010
RealClearPolitics - Video - Krauthammer Slams NPR's Hypocrisy Over Williams And Totenberg
RealClearPolitics - Video - Krauthammer Slams NPR's Hypocrisy Over Williams And Totenberg
I am glad Charles had the courage to step up to the plate and ask the tough question: "What did Juan do to get fired?"
Watch and enjoy.
RR
I am glad Charles had the courage to step up to the plate and ask the tough question: "What did Juan do to get fired?"
Watch and enjoy.
RR
Sunday, October 17, 2010
RealClearPolitics - Video - Axelrod: Journalists Must Probe Chamber Of Commerce
RealClearPolitics - Video - Axelrod: Journalists Must Probe Chamber Of Commerce
Hey Axelnob, I don't remember you making a fuss when Barry was collecting money from foreign entities during the 2008 election. Good job Candy.
RR
Hey Axelnob, I don't remember you making a fuss when Barry was collecting money from foreign entities during the 2008 election. Good job Candy.
RR
Saturday, July 10, 2010
2010 Midterms
I have not written a lot about this subject, but I have spoken about it a great deal with libs on Facebook. Most Democrats are living in some sort of fantasy land. They believe they will be reelected if they simply bash Bush. Well I am here to let them know, that Americans have had enough of the Bush bashing. It cannot last forever. Eventually the "chickens do come home to roost".
I see three trends that are going to make if very difficult for the Democrats to hold onto to their super majorities in Congress.
- The conservative base is very energized about this year's midterm. They have been blogging, writing letters to their congressman/congresswoman and Tea Parties have formed and show that they are a force to be reckoned with (see Ran Paul KY,Sharron Angle NV).
- Democrats have misread the past two election cycles. Since the 2006-08 election cycles Dems have let their hair down so to speak. They have come out of their cloaks and are showing us they are the big spending, higher taxes, die hard liberals we (conservatives) always knew they were. Independents voted for the Dems the past two election cycles, but things are changing. A reader from the Washington Post sums it up this way:
"In 2006, Democrats talked about how bad the economy was and how they could do better. In 2006, unemployment was 4.3% and in decline. After taking control of both branches of Congress (and therefore all legislation and spending), they drove the rate to 8%. With the help of a super-majority in Congress and Obama in the White House in early 2007, they drove the rate to 10% where it hovers now."
This week it was reported that Barry's approval with Independents is slipping away. After having an approval as high as 56% his standing is now hovering around 38%.
- Last but not least is the economy. As stated in the paragraph above, the unemployment rate was around 4.3% when the Dems took over Congress in 2006. Since 2008 the President and this liberal Congress have helped increase this number with their horrible fiscal policies. We have a deficit that is rising faster than the temperature in AZ in the month of August! These guys (and gals) have spent billions and even trillions on healthcare, job bills (lol), a non working stimulus, bailouts, etc...
I have only about 4 months to see if I am right or not, but the way things are going now, I wouldn't bet against me.
RR
I see three trends that are going to make if very difficult for the Democrats to hold onto to their super majorities in Congress.
- The conservative base is very energized about this year's midterm. They have been blogging, writing letters to their congressman/congresswoman and Tea Parties have formed and show that they are a force to be reckoned with (see Ran Paul KY,Sharron Angle NV).
- Democrats have misread the past two election cycles. Since the 2006-08 election cycles Dems have let their hair down so to speak. They have come out of their cloaks and are showing us they are the big spending, higher taxes, die hard liberals we (conservatives) always knew they were. Independents voted for the Dems the past two election cycles, but things are changing. A reader from the Washington Post sums it up this way:
"In 2006, Democrats talked about how bad the economy was and how they could do better. In 2006, unemployment was 4.3% and in decline. After taking control of both branches of Congress (and therefore all legislation and spending), they drove the rate to 8%. With the help of a super-majority in Congress and Obama in the White House in early 2007, they drove the rate to 10% where it hovers now."
This week it was reported that Barry's approval with Independents is slipping away. After having an approval as high as 56% his standing is now hovering around 38%.
- Last but not least is the economy. As stated in the paragraph above, the unemployment rate was around 4.3% when the Dems took over Congress in 2006. Since 2008 the President and this liberal Congress have helped increase this number with their horrible fiscal policies. We have a deficit that is rising faster than the temperature in AZ in the month of August! These guys (and gals) have spent billions and even trillions on healthcare, job bills (lol), a non working stimulus, bailouts, etc...
I have only about 4 months to see if I am right or not, but the way things are going now, I wouldn't bet against me.
RR
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Arizona Immigration Law
As all the talk about immigration heats up I thought I would toss my two cents in. We (Americans that obey the law and care about our country) are always told how we don't care about illegal aliens. Well I for one do care. I care so much that I decided to do some research on our neighbors to the south.
As you may know by now, Governor Jan Brewer signed a tough immigration bill into law on last Friday. Those on the left have not missed an opportunity to paint this bill as racist or unfair. Since I am a man of reason and logic, I decided I would share with you the law of Mexico in regards to immigrants.
• Article 32 claims foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress."
• Article 34 Immigration officials must “ensure” that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (If this were only true in America)
• Article 37 "the equilibrium of the national demographics" is reason enough to bar foreigners from the country. In addition Article 37 finds it ok to bar on the grounds of “economic or national interests” and “if they (foreigners) are not found to be physically or mentally healthy”.
• Article 73 (this one is for San Francisco) Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants.
• Articles 85, 86, and 87 deal with a National Population Registry and a Catalog of Foreigners for the purpose of verifying each individuals identity, tracking those individuals who compromise the population of the country, and making sure each individual is assigned a unique tracking number.
• Article 117 Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished.
• Article 118 Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years.
• Article 119, 120, and 121 Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa maybe sentenced for up to 6 years in prison, and if they misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico (working without a permit) can also be imprisoned.
I could go on and on, but you get the picture that the Mexican government if full of a bunch of hypocrites. I want to congratulate the Arizona legislature and Governor Jan Brewer for having the courage to do what is right by taking a stand against illegal immigration.
RR
As you may know by now, Governor Jan Brewer signed a tough immigration bill into law on last Friday. Those on the left have not missed an opportunity to paint this bill as racist or unfair. Since I am a man of reason and logic, I decided I would share with you the law of Mexico in regards to immigrants.
• Article 32 claims foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress."
• Article 34 Immigration officials must “ensure” that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (If this were only true in America)
• Article 37 "the equilibrium of the national demographics" is reason enough to bar foreigners from the country. In addition Article 37 finds it ok to bar on the grounds of “economic or national interests” and “if they (foreigners) are not found to be physically or mentally healthy”.
• Article 73 (this one is for San Francisco) Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants.
• Articles 85, 86, and 87 deal with a National Population Registry and a Catalog of Foreigners for the purpose of verifying each individuals identity, tracking those individuals who compromise the population of the country, and making sure each individual is assigned a unique tracking number.
• Article 117 Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished.
• Article 118 Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years.
• Article 119, 120, and 121 Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa maybe sentenced for up to 6 years in prison, and if they misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico (working without a permit) can also be imprisoned.
I could go on and on, but you get the picture that the Mexican government if full of a bunch of hypocrites. I want to congratulate the Arizona legislature and Governor Jan Brewer for having the courage to do what is right by taking a stand against illegal immigration.
RR
Friday, March 26, 2010
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Scott Brown Wins!
With 96% of all precincts reporting, Scott Brown has been declared the winner in the special election to replace the late Mass. Senator Ted Kennedy. What seemed impossible just months ago when the Democratic favorite Martha "Marsha" Coakley was up by as much 30 points in some polls has shocked the political world. I know people will talk about this for weeks to come, but the funny thing is all of this could have been avoided.
You see when there was a Republican Governor by the name of Mitt Romney, the Dems in Mass. changed the rules so that the Governor couldn't fill the empty Senate seat by appointment. The Dems thought (Lurch)Sen. John Kerry was going to win the presidency (in 2004). They thought, hey we should hold a special election (to avoid having a Republican appointed). Well none of this matters, because Kerry didn't win. In the end this came back to bite them, because if the rules had remained the same the now Democratic governor could have appointed someone (most likely a Democrat to fill Kennedy's seat or as Brown so eloquently put it the peoples seat of Massachusetts). As a racist pastor once said....the chickens are coming home to roost!
RoddREpub
You see when there was a Republican Governor by the name of Mitt Romney, the Dems in Mass. changed the rules so that the Governor couldn't fill the empty Senate seat by appointment. The Dems thought (Lurch)Sen. John Kerry was going to win the presidency (in 2004). They thought, hey we should hold a special election (to avoid having a Republican appointed). Well none of this matters, because Kerry didn't win. In the end this came back to bite them, because if the rules had remained the same the now Democratic governor could have appointed someone (most likely a Democrat to fill Kennedy's seat or as Brown so eloquently put it the peoples seat of Massachusetts). As a racist pastor once said....the chickens are coming home to roost!
RoddREpub
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)